On 22 Oct 2012, at 10:00, Arifumi Matsumoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2012/10/17 Ray Hunter <[email protected]>: >> >> It's really a question of if we need to further clarify what is meant by >> "default policy" in Section 4.2 of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-06. >> >> Is it the manually configured node-specific default, or the RFC6724 section >> 2.1 default policy table, or is this behaviour simply implementation >> dependent and we should remain silent on an appropriate default? > > IMHO, it should be complex to allow to receive distributed policy even > when the policy is manually configured. However, I agree that it should be > out-of-scope of this document. This document should just state the > requirements as in 4.1. The idea in the original discussions was that 'default policy' meant the default described in the RFC, rather than something local to the site. After all, the reason a site may be using this DHCPv6 option is to change that default. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
