On Dec 12, 2012, at 2:04 PM 12/12/12, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2012, at 18:48, Ole Trøan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> I am a little bit confused what we are talking about. >>> Our draft is necessary when there is no SLAAC. >>> >>> Could you elaborate your viewpoints? >> >> the PIO option in RA has several functions. >> >> 1) with the A-flag on, it is used by SLAAC. >> 2) with the L-flag on, it is used for onlink determination (prefix >> discovery). >> >> "when there is no SLAAC" does that mean? >> - there is no RA >> - there is an empty RA (no PIO) >> - the PIO has A-flag off >> >> if I understand your draft correctly, you want a DHCPv6 alternative to the >> RA PIO option. >> generally we try to avoid duplicate mechanisms, so could you please give a >> use case? > > And so we end up back at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-default-router-00 > and > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg09715.html plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose (English translation: Groundhog Day*) - Ralph *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groundhog_Day_(film) > > Tim > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
