> I think the only way to make progress on this question is to > discuss two points in a much more general way: > > 1. Does the current mapping of the "u" bit in the modified EUI format have > any value? > > 2. Does the current mapping of the "g" bit in the modified EUI format have > any value? > > If the answer to these questions is "no" we could start by saying that they > are *not* mapped from an IEEE EUI into a modified EUI, and then consider > how to use them in future.
or we could consider the interface-id as 64 bits without any implied meaning attached to any of the bits. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
