2013-02-01 21:57, RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> : > > On 01 Feb 2013, at 10:30 , Rémi Després wrote: >> Each of the designs we are interested in depends, to be complete, >> on reservation of a subset of the IID space left unused by RFC4291 >> (that having u=g=1). > > Both are *experiments*. Neither is a standard. > > With respect to Softwire, they decided to standardise > something other than 4rd. Had they decided to > standardise 4rd, my views would be different, > but that wasn't the decision actually made in Softwire. > > For *experiments*, a small shared use experimental > allocation *under RFC-3692 rules* should be both > sufficient and an appropriate approach -- and also > can be used with any other experiments that might arise > in future.
Different understanding. Making the reservation for one design, experimental or not, is a guarantee that no future design with conflict with it, experimental or not. A central registry is the appropriate tool for this. Regards, RD -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
