On 02/04/2013 05:38 AM, Rémi Després wrote: > > (*) It remains that IIDs having u=1 SHOULD be unique, i.e. with rare > enough exceptions. This is somewhat similar to the expectation that > ULA collisions shouldn't be seen). > > This theoretical unicity has been extensively used to assign stable > IIDs, without administrative action, to hosts that have no privacy > constraints requiring the opposite.
If anything, privacy should be an "opt out", rather as an "opt in". In scenarios where privacy matters a lot, if our default policy is "no privacy", those users "opting in" for privacy would be flagged as "suspicious" just for the act of "opting in". Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
