On 02/04/2013 07:06 AM, Rémi Després wrote: > > Le 2013-02-04 à 10:54, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On 02/04/2013 05:38 AM, Rémi Després wrote: >>> >>> (*) It remains that IIDs having u=1 SHOULD be unique, i.e. with rare >>> enough exceptions. This is somewhat similar to the expectation that >>> ULA collisions shouldn't be seen). >>> >>> This theoretical unicity has been extensively used to assign stable >>> IIDs, without administrative action, to hosts that have no privacy >>> constraints requiring the opposite. >> >> If anything, privacy should be an "opt out", rather as an "opt in". > > Same view. > IIDs derived by default from IEEE assigned MAC addresses is a good to have.
Such IIDs do not preserve privacy, so... are you suggesting that they should not be the default algorithm for selecting IIDs with SLAAC? Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
