Hosnieh, On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
> Dear Bob, > > Thanks for the explanation. I would ask that you correct the version number > of my draft to 2 in the following link: > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-6man . Fixed. > I would also ask > that I at least be given some time to explain the purpose of this draft and > the differences between the current mechanisms. Assume we run on time, you should have time for that. > It appears that my draft has not been added to those of the 6man drafts, at > least I can't find it and it is also missing from the PDF agenda, while all > other drafts are listed at your link: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/86/agenda.html. I don't have any control over that, must be some delay from when it is updated. Try reloading the page. Bob > > Thank you, > Hosnieh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:43 PM > To: Hosnieh Rafiee > Cc: Bob Hinden; 'Ole Troan'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86 > > Hosneih, > > It was a mix of things the chairs thought where important and prior history > of the work. We also, of course, have a fixed amount of time and can't > accommodate everything. > > See specific comments below. > > Bob & Ole > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:25 AM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote: > >> Dear All, >> I would appreciate if you explain your criteria for assigning time >> slot to the drafts while other drafts discussed on the mailing list too. >> The recent discussion on the list about the following drafts that you >> assigned the time slot. >> >> draft-boucadair-6man-multicast-addr-arch : 3 discussion on the list : >> 20 mins > > This is an update from earlier w.g. meetings (there has been a lot of email > discussion and presentations). The chairs and the AD think this is a > reasonable compromise to go forward with. > >> draft-carpenter-6man-ug : +10 discussion on the list : 10 mins > > Considerable discussion in this and U&G bits in general. > >> draft-carpenter-6man-ext-transmit : 3 discussion on the list : 15 >> mins > > This is a followup from the previous IETF meeting, the chairs think it's an > important issue to resolve, especially creating an IANA registry for IPv6 > extension headers. > >> draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier : 2 discussion on the list : 15 >> mins > > This was the chairs call as we thought there would be interest in it. Given > the discussion on the list, there appears to be more interest in > <draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt> and we propose to swap them. > There isn't time for everything. > > Comments? > >> draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz : 1 discussion on the list : 10 mins > > This is an IPv6 over Foo document. The IPv6 w.g. is the appropriate place > to standardize these kind of documents. > >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/maillist.html >> >> >> Thank you, >> Hosnieh >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Bob Hinden >> Sent: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 01:03 >> To: IPv6 List >> Cc: Bob Hinden >> Subject: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86 >> >> You can find the current 6MAN agenda at: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-6man >> >> We prioritized drafts that are working group items and drafts that >> have been actively discussed on the list. >> >> As you will note in the agenda, there is a "if time allowed" section >> at the end with short presentations on: >> >> A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6 AutoConfiguration >> draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt >> 6LoWPAN Backbone Router >> draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-02.txt >> DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement >> draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt >> >> We did not think there had been enough discussion or interest on the w.g. >> list to guarantee a speaking slot. We allocated short slots at the >> end of the session if there is time before the meeting ends. If >> anyone (other than the authors) think one of these should be given more > time, please speak up. >> >> Thanks, >> Bob & Ole >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> [email protected] >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
