Jari Arkko <[email protected]> 写于 2013-03-22 05:55:35: > > Hosnieh, > > > What is it that you don't understand. I will be happy to explain it to you. > > Thanks. I read the details, but I'm missing the big picture. I.e., > some effort is required from the owner to create an address. By > repeating that effort (2^59)/2 times, someone else is likely to hit Should be less than (2^59)/2 which is an estimation for hash collision. For the scheme in this draft， the probability of a a second public key is: 1-(1-p)^(2^{1024-48}), where p is the probability of a random number being a RSA public key. For the CGA, the probability of a second public key is:2^{-29.5}*p
The first probability should be quite quite bigger than the second. > the same key with a key pair that he or she controls, and an attack > can be launched. What changes from RFC 3972 to your draft in this > high-level analysis? > > > There has been no resolution to the topic of the thread… > > Ok. Well that clarifies at least the state of the discussion. Thanks. > > Jari > >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
