On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2 Jun 2013, at 17:31, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Well, this is why the homenet arch says that prefix delegation should be >>> efficient. Using DHCP-PD forces a structure to the delegations, and thus >>> potential inefficiency. The OSPF-based solution doesn't have that >>> limitation, but then has to handle potential clashes. >> >> No it _doesn't_. There is no reason for DHCP-PD to be inefficient. Why >> do you think it has to be inefficient? > > Fair point - it would be good if Fred tickled > draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment-01 which talks about that. Yes, draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment describes non-hierarchical assignment, in which all prefixes are delegates from a single server. I'll resuscitate it, as it seems to be a useful reference for this discussion. - Ralph > > Tim > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
