On 03/06/2013 10:31, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: > The kind of painfully obvious solution, especially when we consider the > effects of the much-ballyhooed "Internet of Things," is that we have to allow > for prefixes > /64. > > It's not just home nets. What about automobile nets, or more generically, > "vehicle nets"? Are we going to try to rationalize why every vehicle on the > road, sea, or sky should also be given a /48,
Why is this an issue, since there are 15 trillion of them available? Yes, of course I know about H ratios, but deploying a few billion /48s under some thousands of PA prefixes is well within a prudent policy. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
