Hi,
On 18/06/2013 23:17, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Ole,
>
> On 06/18/2013 10:20 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>> ping?
>> We are thinking that it would be good to have a separate draft that
>> describes the current approaches to IID creation and how they effect
>> privacy and tracking. Somewhat along the lines of the email and chart
>> sent to the IPv6 list by Alissa Cooper.
>>
>> The stable-privacy draft should then wait until that work has
>> progressed.
>
> I'm already working on such I-D.. but I disagree that progrees of this
> document should depend on such document. Why should it?
I tend to agree with Fernando. The dependency is the other way round;
stable-privacy-addresses is a reference for the new draft.
I have the same question about draft-ietf-6man-ug. We responded to
all comments in the -01 version.
Brian
>
> We kind of beaten this issue to death.. and that's the reason for which
> I ended up adding all the text that I added to the I-D.
>
> There's people working on implementations of this document, so we should
> progress it in a timely fashion. Besides, my personal sense of the wg is
> that all of the comments I received were addressed, and that there's
> general agreement to move the document forward.
>
> So, procedurally-speaking, I don't understand the basis of stalling this
> document.
>
> Cheers,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
