Brian, >>>> ping? >>> We are thinking that it would be good to have a separate draft that >>> describes the current approaches to IID creation and how they effect >>> privacy and tracking. Somewhat along the lines of the email and chart >>> sent to the IPv6 list by Alissa Cooper. >>> >>> The stable-privacy draft should then wait until that work has >>> progressed. >> >> I'm already working on such I-D.. but I disagree that progrees of this >> document should depend on such document. Why should it? > > I tend to agree with Fernando. The dependency is the other way round; > stable-privacy-addresses is a reference for the new draft.
possibly; difficult to argue how dependencies should go for a yet-to-be written document. ;-) we're looking at having a session on privacy/tracking and interface identifiers in Berlin. my suggestion was to do the WGLC for stable-privacy-addresses after that. > I have the same question about draft-ietf-6man-ug. We responded to > all comments in the -01 version. we will initiate a last call on that ASAP. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
