On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 11:26 +0000, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > I've been trying to get the DHC WG to address this issue but there > appears to be zero interest in doing anything about it - > see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg14315.html.
I'm interested. Dunno what practical difference that makes :-) I think it would be useful to have the additions you suggest. However, I would suggest making explicit the reasoning for them, and making explicit the potential for IAs to be updated between servers by an out-of-scope mechanism. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: B862 FB15 FE96 4961 BC62 1A40 6239 1208 9865 5F9A Old fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
