On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:09 AM 6/27/13, Karl Auer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 07:17 -0400, Ralph Droms wrote:
>> There is another difference between REBIND and RENEW: the client
>> includes the Server Identifier of the server from which the client
>> received the IA in the RENEW message (but not the REBIND).
> 
> Yes. My question could be summarised I suppose as "what's the point of
> REBIND?" You answer that:
> 
>> The idea is that some external data channel is used to replicate the
>> IA binding from the responsible server to all the other servers.
> 
> And there is no such channel.

Not yet, as part of the DHCP suite of specifications.  Other channels, such as 
a distributed database or grad students at keyboards calling each other, can be 
(have been?) used.

> As you say:
> 
>> There's no such mechanism defined in DHCPv4 (RFC 2131 and RFC 2132),
>> either.  It may be an oversight that it is not mentioned as "out of
>> scope" in RFC 3315.
> 
> The separately defined (albeit still draft) failover system is that
> mechanism for DHCPv4.
> 
> So, at the moment and absent any failover for DHCPv6, there is no point
> to REBIND except for the dubious benefit that addresses that are no good
> any more can possibly be confirmed as duds by other servers.

I would be a little more optimistic and say that REBIND is specified, 
(presumably) implemented and ready to use for non-DHCP mechanisms or failover 
(when specified).

- Ralph

> 
> Regards, K.
> 
> -- 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Karl Auer ([email protected])
> http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
> http://twitter.com/kauer389
> 
> GPG fingerprint: B862 FB15 FE96 4961 BC62 1A40 6239 1208 9865 5F9A
> Old fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to