Ran,
On 04/09/2013 10:38, Ran Atkinson wrote:
> I'd like to see Ray Hunter's proposed text added
> to the I-D, rather than being summarised.
The authors will of course do whatever the WG wants on this.
However, we also have a query out to the IEEE 802.1 liaison,
so it make sense to wait for that.
Brian
>
> I find the detail quite useful. Honestly, it is a more clear
> justification/motivation for this significant specification
> change than anything else I've yet seen. So I believe that
> most other readers also would find that detail useful.
>
> In short, I disagree with Brian's inclination to summarise
> Ray's text, rather than include it, and I concur with Ray
> Hunter's proposal.
>
> Yours,
>
> Ran
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
