All, I'd like to see Ray Hunter's proposed text added to the I-D, rather than having it summarised.
I find the detail quite useful. Honestly, it is a more clear justification/motivation for this significant specification change than anything else I've yet seen. So I believe that most other readers also would find that detail useful. In short, I disagree with Brian's inclination to summarise Ray's text, rather than include it, and I concur with Ray Hunter's proposal. I'd also like to see the various IEEE 802 references mentioned in Ray's text get cited formally as References. One of the key points in Ray's text is that duplicate IIDs "very likely [ will be ] interfering with link-layer transmission" -- something that often seems to be overlooked by folks analysing the duplicate IID scenarios. Yours, Ran -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
