On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:46:04PM +0000, Thomas Walker via ipxe-devel wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:17:22PM +0000, Geert Stappers via ipxe-devel wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:49:09PM +0000, Thomas Walker via ipxe-devel > > wrote: > > > ... happy ... But I'm encontering 2 problems (on master from > > > a couple of weeks back, 7147532c): > > >
Text from original posting > > > Both good and bad are vendor:dev 14e4:165f and subvendor 1028. > > > The older (working) system has a subdevice of 08ff whereas the newer > > > (sort of working) one has a subdevice of 0a6b. re-added. > <...> > > > Any suggestions for either of these? > > > > Share with us which compiler is being used. > > Share with us which compilers have been used. > > > > I've reproduced both the good behavior (on an R6525) and the bad behavior (on > this R7625) using: > gcc 10.2.1 (From Debian Bullseye) > gcc 8.3.0 (From Debian Buster) So more likely that the problem[1] is caused / triggered by hardware differences as by compilers creating too optimistic / optimize code. Groeten Geert Stappers [1] Problem I don't understand, consider to express the problem in other words ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging ) -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ ipxe-devel mailing list ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo/ipxe-devel
