The Law of Unintended Consequences is joyously salivating for an incandescent ban.
Gerry Bishop Niceville, FL -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) B - This is what some RI legislator proposes. CA leads way, along w/couple other states. Bans set several years into future - in tradition adopted during 90s - subsequent to couple election cycles. They know exactly what they're doing. State by state thing. Rooftop beacons here use incandescents, CFB's not recommended. Little things like that escape their notice when crafting one size-a-she-feet-all rules by which all must eventually strangle themselves. Bored? Let's make some more rules! z ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
