Chris Black wrote: > > But my point was: If I were going to test traditional modulation with > something exotic like slow code (true QRSS or otherwise), then I would not > bury it within the regular data, but segment it in some way so that the > recipient would know to alter his receiving technique.
I'm with you Chris in the idea that there should be a definite time for the QRSS in the test if any is to be included in future tests. I was able to hear all of the test tones, sweeps, dual-tones, CW, etc, so I would have been easily able to notice the carrier from the QRSS had there been any transmitted. I was using the NDB setting on Spectran to see the tones as I listened to them audibly. In the case of someone who couldn't hear any of the other tones and wanted to try for the QRSS carriers, knowing exactly when the test would begin would be a help. We did know th exact offsets, so pre-setting Spectran would have been easy, though I didn't see any of the QRSS tones during the time I was monitoring the test. Rick Kunath _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
