I have been reading all your comments regarding the SRF-59 with great interest. I purchased a SRF-59 in 2002 or 2003. The design I was sold was not really spectacular on AM or FM. It was what you would expect from a $15 Walkman. The quality of AM reception was OK. I remember being able to hear WWKB Buffalo for the first 20 minutes or so of my commuter train trip to NYC in pitch darkness (around 5 am local listening inside the train.) WWKB is about 300 miles away from me - clear channel 50 kw directional east. After about a year's use, the tuning capacitor wore through its thin plastic insulation sheets and began to short out below about 900 kHz. Again, AM reception was just OK to maybe a little better than adequate. No razor sharp filtering in any case! FM was very susceptible to overload, especially when listening while walking across Manhattan a mile or so from the Empire State Building and Times Square transmission centers. I also found the plastic flexi-tuning gizmo to be just extraordinarily cheap and flimsy. Bottom line: Sony must have made some radical changes in this design while retaining the model number. It must be an entirely different radio now. Karl Zuk N2KZ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 02:45:18 -0500> To: > [email protected]> Subject: Re: [IRCA] All Hail the SRF-59!> > OK Bruce,> > > The DT210V sounds good enough to be a worthy contestant in the next > > (2008) Pocket Radio Shootout, after this year's competitors slug it out. It > > will be ordered ASAP (as if I really needed any persuasion). 9 kHz splits > with > memories is a great advantage, although my own experience leads me to > doubt > that any digital pocket radio can equal the SRF-59's selectivity. > Sony has > packed some mean power in that SRF-59 design, and if you can > adjust to the > analog tuning, it's truly a DXer's dream machine.> > > 73, > Gary > > > > **************************************Check out AOL's list of > 2007's hottest > products.> > (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)> > _______________________________________________> IRCA mailing list> > [email protected]> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original > contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its > editors, publishing staff, or officers> > For more information: > http://www.ircaonline.org> > To Post a message: [email protected]> _________________________________________________________________ You keep typing, we keep giving. Download Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGLM _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
