Things seemed to improve again this morning, with a definite peak between 1305 
and 1310UT, though I listened for about 10 minutes either side.  The upper band 
was pretty quiet except for HLAZ, and there were several Aussies in the mix.   
I continue to be surprised at the strength of some of the carriers such as 
Tahiti-738,  HLCA-972, HLAZ-1566, all apparently undermodulated, and 1098 
(presumed Marshall Islands) which leaves its carrier on after sign off.  1053 
has been strong also the last few mornings, but hearing any modulation seems 
difficult; maybe the jammer is taking a rest, but still pumping out the big 
carrier?

Asiatic unless otherwise noted:


pretty darn good audio (at least briefly): 774 (NHK-2)

reasonable audios (though often battling w/splash): 828 (NHK2), 972 (Korea) 
best heard here in awhile 

not so reasonable audio, occasional words in splash or noise: 567 didn't seem 
//594, so don't think it was NHK1, but no Aussie parallel either; 594 (NHK-1), 
702 (2BL //612), 738 (2NR //702 around 1320UT) 1116 DU, first heard in a long 
while, 1242 seemed to be Japanese, however

Burbles in the splatter and noise:  612 (4QR), 837 (NHK1 and ?; heard pips at 
1300, but something else there too), 747 (NHK2), 954 and 1134, both likely 
Japan,  1206 likely China with its telltale hum with a man talking underneath.  
1566 all carrier, not much modulation.

Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter): 738 DU, 
 1053

Given the lack of other Chinese, receptions, and the fact that 1206 isn't that 
common here, I'm a little surprised at how regular this one has become the last 
little while.  It can't be called readable, but it's had a reasonably beefy 
signal.


best wishes,

Nick





*****************************
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to