>>Depends on the type. If it's the copper based version, regular UHF plugs can be soldered on just as is done with the more common RG-8. The aluminum based type would use a specific crimp connector which would require the right tools. One problem with RG-6 for MW frequency is the loss. The center conductor is copper coated steel. This has a higher resistive loss as the frequency drops. RG-6 used for video is solid copper center conductor. This is for composite video, not VHF or UHF. Rather than use RG-11 I'd probably buy RG-8 that is suitable for being buried. Even RG-58 would be OK if it's under 100 feet or so. It can be bought with connectors already installed. Plug and play. Another test I made is making a balun for each end and using CAT5 ethernet network cable. It's balanced and gathers less noise or unwanted signals on the way in. Also cheap and very easy to build. Craig Healy Providence, RI<<
Thanks Craig. I have thought of using the RG11 for TV UHF to drop a bit of loss. However the distance I am going is only 70-80 feet. I am currently using RG6, so I don't know if the added work & expense would be worth it. I would rather use copper over aluminum. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin Seaside OR KGED QSL Manager _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
