Someone please advise me here as I am extremely weak when it comes to cables and baluns and I think it hold me back from using absolute state of the art antennas and means that I DX outside in my truck rather than inside in comfort since I often don't use cables.
Anyhow...isn't CAT5 four pairs of twisted pair? How do you not use a balun and where is a link to how to make one. I need something better than these trashy Radio Shack 50 ft cables that get damaged passing under my car door and probably are full of common-mode snake currents. 73 and thx .. KAZ -----Original Message----- >From: Mark Durenberger Mobile <[email protected]> >Sent: Jul 28, 2011 11:15 AM >To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America ><[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] RG11 > >I would second the Cat 5e approach. I've done a number of controlled tests >and it outperforms RG-58 hands down, MW thru 10 meters, for noise >performance and signal loss. With shorter runs (50 feet or so) I haven't >needed baluns. > >Mark Durenberger > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Craig Healy > >Rather than use RG-11 I'd probably buy RG-8 that is suitable for being >buried. Even RG-58 would be OK if it's under 100 feet or so. It can be >bought with connectors already installed. Plug and play. > >Another test I made is making a balun for each end and using CAT5 ethernet >network cable. It's balanced and gathers less noise or unwanted signals on >the way in. Also cheap and very easy to build. > > >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >[email protected] >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original >contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its >editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
