According to the Radio Locator Site, KPMI is 2.5 kw ND days and 600 w 
directional (probably to protect KGLO) at night.  They're much weaker in Grand 
Rapids than KKBJ (1360) days and also get a very slight bit of slop from our 
local KOZY (1320).  I haven't heard them (too much KGLO and WOOD) at night 
here, although I haven't tried very hard!  

The FCC Site for WBKK shows its power at 10 kw days and 750 watts night.  It 
appears that they have the same pattern day and night; most of the signal goes 
north-northeast.  Probably, they protect WFAA at night and WCCO (in particular, 
its digihash on 820) during the day.  Fortunately, for me, WBKK is about 90˚ 
from WCCO so I'm hoping to be able to null their WCCO's hash and have a decent 
shot at WBKK, at least during the day.  At night, it will be interesting, since 
CHAM is a generally a powerhouse here.

Hope this helps. - John



On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:36 PM, Todd wrote:

> What is both of their powers and ant patterns? 
> 
> Todd Skaine 
> Woodbury, MN
> 2010, PL 310 or 
> Toyota radio
> 
> John Sampson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Not heard here as of yesterday.  The new 1300 station in Bemidji has been on 
>> for a couple of months.  Not very strong in Grand Rapids (about 60 miles 
>> east). - John S.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 1, 2012, at 9:03 AM, David Yocis wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> The FCC web site says that the FCC accepted applications this week from the 
>>> CP for new station WBKK-820 in Wilton MN (near Bemidji) for a license to 
>>> cover and program test authority -- meaning the station should be testing 
>>> soon, if it's not doing so already.  Has anyone in the area heard anything?
>>> 
>>> David Yocis
>>> Washington, DC
>>>                                       
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IRCA mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>> 
>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>> 
>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>> 
>>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: [email protected]
> 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to