Hi Nigel, Wow, it was the exact opposite during this last morning here at Rockwork 4.
By far the best morning for Australia the whole week, with 576, 774 and 792 pegging the PL-380 S/N readout. The Kiwis were enhanced too, though, leading to snarling fights on many frequencies. The only thing that seemed dead here was the X-band :-) 73, Gary DeBock (in Cannon Beach, OR) -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Pimblett <[email protected]> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Jul 27, 2013 7:21 am Subject: [IRCA] Alberta DU for 27 July 2013 This morning looked like a dud when I first tuned in at 1100, with even Tahiti's carrier very weak. Indeed, Tahiti never did reach audio today, and most of the other carriers were weaker than the past while. Was pleasantly surprised when I reached the X-band though, to find weak audio on both 1629 and 1701. Multiple carriers at varying offsets noted on 1629. 1701 had two distinct ones, of similar strength. Brisvaani has been heard here numerous times (though never in July), and the music I heard could certainly have been them, but with a weak signal (and IBOC noise from 1690) it was hard to be certain. The two strongest non-Xband carriers were on 1566 and 1575, both very near to audio, so evidently the higher frequencies were strongly favoured today. 73, Nigel Pimblett Dunmore, Alberta _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
