DX tests were once the best think a BCB Dxer could look forward to (along with 
regular monthly frequency checks by stations).


I, and many others in our club were aware of a certain individual who was 
cheating on DX tests and doing so in a very brash manner. We made it known that 
these activities were not acceptable and even communicated the problem with 
station personnel.


I believe that the vast majority of folks in our hobby are decent and honest 
folks and it would be a shame to completely do away with such a tradition due 
to one or two bad apples.


Mike Sanburn


________________________________
From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Rick Dau 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 10:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: [IRCA] RIP DX Tests (was: Re: Rackley on Synchronous AM Boosters)

Sorry, DXers of the world, but it's high time that DX tests be done away 
with....



Back in the day, some unscrupulous participants in the hobby made it a practice 
of waiting about 2-3 weeks after tests were conducted, looking through the 
pages of DX News, DX Monitor, and other print publications, jotting down the 
details of what OTHERS were hearing, then sending their own faux reports based 
from those details off to the testing stations.  Very often, engineers would 
happily mail back QSLs to the offenders, totally unaware of what was going on.  
Fortunately, a select few DID get wise to the shenanigans being perpetrated and 
then began conducting tests with the caveat that reports had to be mailed 
within a scant few days (say, within a week or so) after the test, or they 
would simply not reply to the report.  This was, in effect, to curtail the 
cheating.



But with the progress of technology comes a downside.  Through reflectors such 
as these, along with message boards, DX chatrooms (WHEN they work), and other 
means of instant communication, the cheaters are once again seeing the 
information that others are posting without making their OWN efforts to hear 
the stations.   DX tests were fun while they lasted, but, IMHO, they need to be 
put down.



73,

Rick Dau

South Omaha, Nebraska

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
[email protected] [ABDX] <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 5:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ABDX] Re: Rackley on Synchronous AM Boosters



To answer Todd`s question about anyone hearing KKOB Santa Fe, recently
in my reports and DXLD:

Also, I have repeatedly called for a DX test to be arranged on Santa Fe only, 
turning off the main Albuquerque transmitter, however briefly (without of 
course, trying to set it up, myself; maybe I would if I still lived in ABQ) And 
now there is no CPC chairman. Glenn

__._,_.___
________________________________
Posted by: [email protected]
__,_._,___
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
International Radio Club of America<http://www.ircaonline.org/>
www.ircaonline.org
Web Site for the International Radio Club of America



To Post a message: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to