John Lam (DLR) wrote: > Rahil Kantharia: > >> Can i work with asp.net, as easily with ironruby as asp.net works today >> with C# and Vb.net. > > This is on the roadmap, and will be an important part of our .NET > Interop story. We haven't had cycles to think about this yet. > > I'd like to turn this around: how would the community like to see this > feature implemented? What exactly is it about Ruby and ASP.NET[MVC] that > makes it compelling? Do you have scenarios in mind? > > Thanks, > -John
it would be nice to use the ruby hash/symbols over something like c#/vb.net (don't get me wrong, i love c# and even thanks to the new 3.0 specs for c# was able to create a ruby like hash for c#, but in mvc it uses anonymous objects, and you know that uses reflection (which is a performance hit), but I think using ruby like hashes and even symbols would just make the code even that much more cleaner. Though personally i've been working on a c# port of active record since the whole asp.net mvc was announced, subsonic & castles active record just doesn't cut it. The activerecord stuff is in the framework/amplify.widgets/amplify.activerecord folder, and the hash and inflector.net extentions are in the framework/amplify.linq folder. http://code.google.com/p/amplify-net/ -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
