John Lam (DLR) wrote: > Can you elaborate on this idea with some code fragments of how you would > like IronRuby + MVC to look like? Where would you like to see this? In > Views, in Controllers? Where does it make sense and where does it not > make sense. How exactly is ASP.NET MVC better than ROR? Can you put some > code frags side-by-side where you would show how something done in > IronRuby + MVC would be superior to something done in ROR? > > Concrete examples, please. > > Thanks, > -John
----------------------------------------------------------- Hi John, As a Fresh student, i can give few points rather than codes and working examples, since i am on a learning stage and i have not seen a single code so far based on Asp.Net MVC + IronRuby... I can quickly point few great advantages as below, with ROR is missing. (1) Code behind/Code besides support with asp.net -- ROR does not have it. (2) Master Pages ---ROR does not have it except helper methods and something alike for viewing (3) BCL ( Great, BCL with almost 13,000 classes --- ROR does not come near by ) (4) Support to bring the classes from other languages like Iropython, VB. C# (5) Great MISCROSOFT brand name, that assures and gives a piece of mind (6) WinForms and MVC way... Both the ways i can work --- ROR has only MVC (7) IIS + SQL Server support--- ROR developers are still struggling for this (8) Deployment as easy as click. ( Not easy with ROR ) Well i think, my other seniors around can write more on this, since as a student i have limited knowledge currently, but this is what i have gathered. P.S:- BTW, dear John, you are a genius in this segment, you know much much better than me, are you testing my knowledge level...? One thing i can beat you here is... I am more IronRuby fan than you. Cheers Rahil -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
