John Lam (DLR) wrote:
> Last time i talked to Miguel, he said that they were done implementing 
> linq modulo bugs.
>
In some ways Mono users are better off in this regard. Presumably when 
integrated it will just be a standard part of Mono.

For .NET users it is an additional dependency.

Michael Foord
http://www.manning.com/foord

> - John
> Sent from my phone
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 10:08 AM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Planning to change IronRuby.sln to a VS 
> 2008 project
>
> Linq would be the biggest thing.  The reason being, when devs begin to 
> get very serious with new things like this, mono users are screwed...
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Michael Letterle 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     I think the primary concern would be with C# 3.0 features that the
>     mono compiler does not support, i.e. Extension Methods, Lambdas,
>     Linq...  Though I know they've been working towards support.
>     Secondary concerns would be .NET 3.0+ libraries that Mono hasn't
>     implemented yet.  Right now (well as of Rev 77) I can compile IronRuby
>     on mono in Linux, don't want to loose that.
>
>     On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Tomas Matousek
>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     > Can you be more specific? Are you worried about support of the
>     additional features on Mono? Or are there any issues with
>     installing .NET Framework 3.5?
>     >
>     >  Tomas
>     >
>     >
>     >  -----Original Message-----
>     >  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Michael
>     Foord
>     >  Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 1:09 PM
>     >  To: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >  Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Planning to change IronRuby.sln to
>     a VS 2008 project
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
>     >  > 2008/3/22, John Lam (DLR) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>     >  >
>     >  >> If anyone strongly objects, please let me know ASAP.
>     >  >>
>     >  >
>     >  > Choice of VS version doesn't affect me (since I don't use VS) but
>     >  > choice of C# language version does. If IronRuby's use of C# 3
>     features
>     >  > causes me trouble, I will scream loudly so that you will know. :)
>     >  >
>     >  >
>     >  Depending on .NET 3 features will greatly reduce the number of
>     people
>     >  capable of running IronRuby...
>     >
>     >  Michael Foord
>     >  _______________________________________________
>     >  Ironruby-core mailing list
>     >  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>     >  _______________________________________________
>     >  Ironruby-core mailing list
>     >  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>     Michael Letterle
>     [Polymath Prokrammer]
>     http://blog.prokrams.com
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ironruby-core mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>   

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to