In any case, there will be an interop question to answer here. I think  
we can assume .net will always be x number of features ahead of mono.

Being a .net developer by day, interop with .net would be more  
important for me. I'd love for ironruby to be able to support all of  
my .net artifacts no matter when we upgrade. I'm sure plenty of people  
in the list will think mono support is more important to them.

I'm wondering how possible it will be to support both scenarios by  
mixing in the different language constructs when needed.

I realize the interop stories haven't been given much thought yet, but  
the earlier this dialog is started the better off the implementers  
will be when its time to hit the road.

Aaron


On Mar 23, 2008, at 13:57, Michael Foord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

> John Lam (DLR) wrote:
>> Last time i talked to Miguel, he said that they were done  
>> implementing
>> linq modulo bugs.
>>
> In some ways Mono users are better off in this regard. Presumably when
> integrated it will just be a standard part of Mono.
>
> For .NET users it is an additional dependency.
>
> Michael Foord
> http://www.manning.com/foord
>
>> - John
>> Sent from my phone
>>
>> --- 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> From: Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 10:08 AM
>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Planning to change IronRuby.sln to a VS
>> 2008 project
>>
>> Linq would be the biggest thing.  The reason being, when devs begin  
>> to
>> get very serious with new things like this, mono users are screwed...
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Michael Letterle
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>    I think the primary concern would be with C# 3.0 features that the
>>    mono compiler does not support, i.e. Extension Methods, Lambdas,
>>    Linq...  Though I know they've been working towards support.
>>    Secondary concerns would be .NET 3.0+ libraries that Mono hasn't
>>    implemented yet.  Right now (well as of Rev 77) I can compile  
>> IronRuby
>>    on mono in Linux, don't want to loose that.
>>
>>    On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Tomas Matousek
>>    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> Can you be more specific? Are you worried about support of the
>>    additional features on Mono? Or are there any issues with
>>    installing .NET Framework 3.5?
>>>
>>> Tomas
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Michael
>>    Foord
>>> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 1:09 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Planning to change IronRuby.sln to
>>    a VS 2008 project
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
>>>> 2008/3/22, John Lam (DLR) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>>>>
>>>>> If anyone strongly objects, please let me know ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Choice of VS version doesn't affect me (since I don't use VS) but
>>>> choice of C# language version does. If IronRuby's use of C# 3
>>    features
>>>> causes me trouble, I will scream loudly so that you will know. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Depending on .NET 3 features will greatly reduce the number of
>>    people
>>> capable of running IronRuby...
>>>
>>> Michael Foord
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Michael Letterle
>>    [Polymath Prokrammer]
>>    http://blog.prokrams.com
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Ironruby-core mailing list
>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>>
>> --- 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to