Yes, the source is on my home drive in a subdir named IronRuby, and yes, I navigated to the folder.
Thanks. -Rob On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you download the sources into your home drive. It looks like you need > to navigate into the folder where you downloaded the ironruby source and > then call rake :) > > On 9/05/2008, at 2:09 PM, Robert Bazinet wrote: > > I am attempting to build r100 on Mono on my Mac and getting an error I have > not seen before. I have followed the instructions and used the provided > patch. Here is what I get: > > rbazinet: ~$ rake --trace compile mono=1 > rake aborted! > No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb, > Rakefile.rb) > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:2143:in > `raw_load_rakefile' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1897:in `load_rakefile' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1948:in > `standard_exception_handling' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1896:in `load_rakefile' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1880:in `run' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1948:in > `standard_exception_handling' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1878:in `run' > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/bin/rake:31 > /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load' > /usr/bin/rake:19 > > Is this just some dumb I am missing? > > Thanks, > Rob Bazinet > > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> WARNING: This is against revision 100. Revision 101 will compile, but >> will not run on Mono at the time. I am still working on it. In case >> you didn't know, you can use "svn update -r 100" to "update" to >> not-the-latest version. >> >> Stuffs are in the usual place: >> http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/~tinuviel/download/IronRuby/<http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/%7Etinuviel/download/IronRuby/> >> >> patch-mono-r100 consists of four different things: >> >> 1. One-line case-sensitivity patch to Rakefile. >> 2. Workaround for long-standing console problem. >> 3. Workaround for Mono bug #387040, by changing explicit interface >> implementations to implicit one. >> 4. Workaround for Mono bug #387502, by rewriting ?? operator with if >> statement. This is a SVN regression and you don't need it if you are >> using Mono 1.9. >> >> Links to Mono bugs: >> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387040 >> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387502 >> >> P.S. DLR, IronPython, IronRuby team should create C# compiler test >> suite! You guys have the talent! >> >> -- >> Seo Sanghyeon >> _______________________________________________ >> Ironruby-core mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >> > > > > -- > Rob Bazinet > InfoQ Ruby and .NET Editor > http://www.accidentaltechnologist.com > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > -- Rob Bazinet InfoQ Ruby and .NET Editor http://www.accidentaltechnologist.com
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
