I like second option too. But why --dlr? Why not --repl? -- Oleg
From: Jim Deville Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM To: Tomas Matousek; IronRuby Team Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Executables I like the switch option best. We also need to add a -e option to pass some of the specs. JD From: Tomas Matousek Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 PM To: IronRuby Team Cc: [email protected] Subject: Executables Today we have ir.exe that combines functionality of ruby.exe and a command line REPL. Shouldn't we have also iruby.exe that mimics ruby.exe (ie. if no file is given it reads input from standard input)? Some specs expects that behavior (they start a new process ruby.exe and write to its input stream). Another option would be to have a single executable ir.exe that behaves like ruby.exe and e.g. --dlr switch that makes it run DLR REPL loop. Tomas
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
