We don't want our interop tests to be testing irb.rb though. :) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Executables
? interop works through IRB just as well... C:\>ir ruby\bin\irb irb(main):001:0> require 'mscorlib' => true irb(main):002:0> require 'System.Windows.Forms, Version=2.0.0.0<http://2.0.0.0>, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' => true irb(main):003:0> f = System::Windows::Forms::Form.new => #<System::Windows::Forms::Form:0x00001b8> irb(main):004:0> i = f.show_dialog => #<System::Windows::Forms::DialogResult:0x00001ea> Am I missing something? On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Tomas Matousek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: We need DLR REPL for testing interop. Tomas From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:50 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Executables Is there a particular reason we need the executable to do the REPL itself? ir.exe runs irb just fine, and is actually what I've been using lately (there's a few annoyances but nothing earth shattering) On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Tomas Matousek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Could be --repl. From: Oleg Tkachenko Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:35 PM To: Jim Deville; Tomas Matousek; IronRuby Team Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: Executables I like second option too. But why --dlr? Why not --repl? -- Oleg From: Jim Deville Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM To: Tomas Matousek; IronRuby Team Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: Executables I like the switch option best. We also need to add a -e option to pass some of the specs. JD From: Tomas Matousek Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 PM To: IronRuby Team Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Executables Today we have ir.exe that combines functionality of ruby.exe and a command line REPL. Shouldn't we have also iruby.exe that mimics ruby.exe (ie. if no file is given it reads input from standard input)? Some specs expects that behavior (they start a new process ruby.exe and write to its input stream). Another option would be to have a single executable ir.exe that behaves like ruby.exe and e.g. --dlr switch that makes it run DLR REPL loop. Tomas _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -- Michael Letterle [Polymath Prokrammer] http://blog.prokrams.com _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -- Michael Letterle [Polymath Prokrammer] http://blog.prokrams.com
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
