Updated my patch to Ruby Gems to match on "universal-dotnetX.X", where X.X
is the version number.

This will allow for the creation of .NET-specific gems with names like:
- gemname-dotnet
- gemname-dotnet-2.0
- gemname-dotnet-4.0
- gemname-universal-dotnet
- gemname-universal-dotnet-2.0
- gemname-universal-dotnet-4.0

If there are no objections, I'll resubmit to Ruby Gems.

--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/


On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero <
i...@whiterabbitconsulting.eu> wrote:

> I don't care either way as long as it's lower-case
>
> On Thursday, March 11, 2010, Orion Edwards <orion.edwa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> The name is spelled as “.NET”, and so "gemname-universal-dotNET" would
> read better than just "gemname-universal-dotnet".
> >
> >
> > dotNET looks awful. Microsoft are well known for terrible marketing and
> terrible naming, so I'd argue that "use the correct spelling" is an
> anti-feature :-)
> >
> >
> > Personally, I like Tomas' suggestion of clr
> > gemname-universal-clr2.0 looks very nice :-)
> >
> >
>
> --
> ---
> Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
> Ivan Porto Carrero - Mob: +32.486.787.582
> Web: http://whiterabbitconsulting.eu - http://flanders.co.nz
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim
> Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
> Microsoft IronRuby/C# MVP
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>

Attachment: dotnet_ironruby_support.diff
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to