Updated my patch to Ruby Gems to match on "universal-dotnetX.X", where X.X is the version number.
This will allow for the creation of .NET-specific gems with names like: - gemname-dotnet - gemname-dotnet-2.0 - gemname-dotnet-4.0 - gemname-universal-dotnet - gemname-universal-dotnet-2.0 - gemname-universal-dotnet-4.0 If there are no objections, I'll resubmit to Ruby Gems. -- Will Green http://hotgazpacho.org/ On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero < i...@whiterabbitconsulting.eu> wrote: > I don't care either way as long as it's lower-case > > On Thursday, March 11, 2010, Orion Edwards <orion.edwa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> The name is spelled as “.NET”, and so "gemname-universal-dotNET" would > read better than just "gemname-universal-dotnet". > > > > > > dotNET looks awful. Microsoft are well known for terrible marketing and > terrible naming, so I'd argue that "use the correct spelling" is an > anti-feature :-) > > > > > > Personally, I like Tomas' suggestion of clr > > gemname-universal-clr2.0 looks very nice :-) > > > > > > -- > --- > Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations > Ivan Porto Carrero - Mob: +32.486.787.582 > Web: http://whiterabbitconsulting.eu - http://flanders.co.nz > Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim > Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero) > Microsoft IronRuby/C# MVP > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >
dotnet_ironruby_support.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
