Sounds great. Thanks for pushing on this! From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 7:19 PM To: ironruby-core Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Updated my patch to Ruby Gems to match on "universal-dotnetX.X", where X.X is the version number. This will allow for the creation of .NET-specific gems with names like: - gemname-dotnet - gemname-dotnet-2.0 - gemname-dotnet-4.0 - gemname-universal-dotnet - gemname-universal-dotnet-2.0 - gemname-universal-dotnet-4.0 If there are no objections, I'll resubmit to Ruby Gems. -- Will Green http://hotgazpacho.org/ On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero <i...@whiterabbitconsulting.eu<mailto:i...@whiterabbitconsulting.eu>> wrote: I don't care either way as long as it's lower-case On Thursday, March 11, 2010, Orion Edwards <orion.edwa...@gmail.com<mailto:orion.edwa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> The name is spelled as “.NET”, and so "gemname-universal-dotNET" would read >>> better than just "gemname-universal-dotnet". > > > dotNET looks awful. Microsoft are well known for terrible marketing and > terrible naming, so I'd argue that "use the correct spelling" is an > anti-feature :-) > > > Personally, I like Tomas' suggestion of clr > gemname-universal-clr2.0 looks very nice :-) > > -- --- Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations Ivan Porto Carrero - Mob: +32.486.787.582 Web: http://whiterabbitconsulting.eu - http://flanders.co.nz Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero) Microsoft IronRuby/C# MVP _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
