On a related note, we should come up with a better way to keep our copy of RubySpec in sync with the "truth": https://github.com/rubyspec/rubyspec/. Volunteers welcome.
On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Jimmy Schementi wrote: > Thanks! Looks good. Submit a pull request and I'll merge it in. > > You can submit a pull request along with sending it to the mailing list for > code review; it's a good way to keep track of open reviews. > > ~js > > On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Enrico Sada wrote: >> Hi, i fixed workitem #6244 >> (https://github.com/enricosada/IronLanguages/commit/c9d8339441e21a90216b9b51cffd23f5225d0174), >> i added '%N' option to time.strftime. >> >> I added also the test to strftime mspec. I dont think i need to change >> ironruby-tags-19, because the new test should pass now. >> >> This is my first commit to ironruby, wiki say i need to ask to ml for code >> review before pull request. There is other i need to do? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ironruby-core mailing list >> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
