http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/


bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful



=== News Update ===

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed: The Ultimate Patsy "Confesses"

You can trust a press release from a heavily redacted secret military tribunal of a tortured detainee conducted by individuals representative of an oligarchy whose every deception, gross violation of U.S. law, and act of imperial bloodletting over the last six years rests on maintaining the orthodoxy of the official 9/11 myth

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the alleged "Al-Qaeda mastermind," has confessed to direct involvement in a myriad of terrorist attacks and assassination plots around the world, including 9/11 "from A to Z," but some are likely to be disappointed that after 5 years of torture he stopped short of accepting responsibility for killing Kennedy, creating AIDS and being the real Santa Claus.

In his first interview following 9/11, Osama Bin Laden denied any involvement in the attacks.

"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle," Bin Laden told the Pakistani based <http://www.robert-fisk.com/usama_interview_ummat.htm>Ummat newspaper.

If Bin Laden wasn't involved in 9/11 then Khalid Shaikh Mohammed's "confession" is rendered obsolete.

But since Khalid has squealed on the "A to Z" of 9/11, perhaps he can provide some answers to a few troubling little questions that still have us 9/11 "conspiracy nuts" running around in circles;

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the FBI ordering the <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html>1993 World Trade Center bombing to go ahead? In his confession, KSM says he ran the attack but fails to explain why it was the FBI who provided the terror cell with the bomb materials through their informant.

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for NORAD completely reversing its standard operating procedure on the day of 9/11?

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the collapse of three steel buildings, one that was not hit by a plane, from fire damage alone for the first and only time in history?

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for warning, <http://www.prisonplanet.com/911/warned.htm>according to Newsweek, a group of top Pentagon officials to cancel their flights on the evening of September 10th due to security concerns?

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the record number of 'put' options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, that were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th? This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating 'airline stocks set to fly.'

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for blocking <http://www.prisonplanet.com/bush_took_fbi_off_laden_trail.html>FBI anti-terrorism investigations before 9/11 related to the bin Laden family and Saudi charities that were front groups for Al-Qaeda?

- Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for advising the Secret Service not to remove President Bush from a completely unsecured Florida elementary school by letting them know he wasn't a target on 9/11?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/150307ultimatepatsy.htm

===

Alleged Architect Of 9/11 Confesses To Many Attacks - Believe it or not

In a rambling statement delivered Saturday to a closed-door military tribunal, Mohammed declared himself an enemy of the United States and claimed some responsibility for many of the major terrorist attacks on U.S. and allied targets over more than a decade. He said that he is at war with the United States and that the deaths of innocent people are an unfortunate consequence of that conflict.

Mohammed presented evidence, in the form of a written statement, in which he appears to allege abuse. The tribunal president told Mohammed he had received the statement "regarding certain treatment that you claim to have received" before arriving at Guantanamo Bay.

The tribunal president also asked whether any statements he made under interrogation were "as the result of any of the treatment." Mohammed answered: "CIA peoples. Yes. At the beginning when they transferred me . . ." The rest of the sentence is redacted from the transcript.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/14/AR2007031402102_pf.html

===

CIA holds young sons of captured al-Qa'eda chief - America Democracy Style

Two young sons of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the September 11 attacks, are being used by the CIA to force their father to talk.

Yousef al-Khalid, nine, and his brother, Abed al-Khalid, seven, were taken into custody in Pakistan last September when intelligence officers raided a flat in Karachi where their father had been hiding.

Their father, Mohammed, 37, is being interrogated at the Bagram US military base in Afghanistan. He is being held in solitary confinement and subjected to <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=TWVY4WCUAVRLNQFIQMGCFGGAVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2003/03/05/walqa105.xml>"stress and duress"-style interrogation techniques.

He has been told that his sons are being held and he is being encouraged to divulge future attacks against the West and talk about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/03/09/walqa09.xml

===

CIA's Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described - Dictatorship

Sources Say Agency's Tactics Lead to Questionable Confessions, Sometimes to Death

Nov. 18, 2005 — Harsh interrogation techniques authorized by top officials of the CIA have led to questionable confessions and the death of a detainee since the techniques were first authorized in mid-March 2002, ABC News has been told by former and current intelligence officers and supervisors.
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1322866

===

Harsh C.I.A. Methods Cited in Top Qaeda Interrogations

WASHINGTON, May 12 — The Central Intelligence Agency has used coercive interrogation methods against a select group of high-level leaders and operatives of Al Qaeda that have produced growing concerns inside the agency about abuses, according to current and former counterterrorism officials.

At least one agency employee has been disciplined for threatening a detainee with a gun during questioning, they said.

In the case of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a high-level detainee who is believed to have helped plan the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, C.I.A. interrogators used graduated levels of force, including a technique known as "water boarding," in which a prisoner is strapped down, forcibly pushed under water and made to believe he might drown.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/13/politics/13DETA.html?ex=1174966154&ei=1&en=a785ed282983d4cd

===

Officials: Mohammed exaggerated claims

A CIA official declined to analyze Mohammed's statements.

One official cautioned that many of Mohammed's claims during interrogation were "white noise" — designed to send the U.S. on wild goose chases or to get him through the day's interrogation session.

In the Defense Department transcript, Mohammed said his statement was not made under duress. But Mohammed and human rights advocates have alleged that he was tortured, and legal experts say that could taint all his statements.

"In light of the rambling nature of his statements, and the views of some that he is prone to exaggerate his importance, we cannot feel confident we know exactly the level of his involvement in various prior attacks," said Joshua Dressler, a criminal law expert at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University.

The CIA has denied it uses torture. "The agency's terrorist interrogation program has been conducted lawfully, with great care and close review, producing vital information that has helped disrupt plots and save lives," spokesman Paul Gimigliano said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070315/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/terrorist_plots_4

===

Can Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's 'tortured' testimony be trusted?

On Thursday, NBC's Today Show explored whether the confessions of alleged 9/11 "mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed can be trusted, since he claimed to have been tortured after being detained.

"Let's talk about the issue of torture," NBC's Matt Lauer said. "He says in his statement that he didn't make this statement under duress or pressure, but he does also say that he was tortured by the CIA after his capture."

Last September, CIA sources told ABC News that the harshest technique they were authorized to use on "high-value detainees, such as the 9/11 attacks architect Khalid Sheikh Mohamed...was called 'water boarding,' in which a prisoner's face was covered with cellophane, and water is poured over it (pictured above) -- meant to trigger an unbearable gag reflex."
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Can_Khalid_Sheikh_Mohammeds_tortured_testimony_0315.html

===

A Breakthrough in the War on Terror? I'll Believe It When We See Some Evidence

. . . True, Mr Mohammed is the uncle of the 1993 World Trade Centre conspirator Ramzi Yousef and a brother of an al-Qa'ida operative. True, another brother was killed in a bomb explosion in Pakistan--he was allegedly making the bomb at the time. But claims that he was the 11 September "mastermind"--"It's hard to overstate how significant this is," the ever loquacious Mr Fleischer told the world yesterday--are still unprovable. Hitherto, the nearest to a "mastermind" anyone got was Mounir al-Motassadeq, who was jailed in Germany last month as an accessory to mass murder. . . .

Consider following facts:
But, sometime between then and early Saturday morning, when Mohammed was captured in Pakistan, the U.S. government identified Mohammed as the mastermind behind the al-Qaida plot.--Debra Pickett, "<http://www.suntimes.com/output/pickett/cst-nws-pickett04.html>'Terror Boss' Moves Up Ladder As U.S. Sees Fit," Chicago Sun-Times, March 4, 2003]

[Mrs Mahlaqa Khanum is the mother of Ahmed Qadoos, the 42-year-old Pakistani accused of sheltering the mastermind of the September 11 attacks. . . . His mother produced a medical report describing him as a "low IQ person" . . .

"They took my diaries and address book, a box of family photographs, tapes of the Koran that I like listening to and a computer we bought last month for the children." . . . Qadoos's daughter Aisha said: "It was our computer. We didn't even have the internet. It just had some games--Aladdin and The Lion King." . . .

http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/0303-Mastermind.html

===

Muslim groups decry Quebec's hijab 'ultimatum'

MONTREAL ­ The Quebec government is turning a blind eye to sensible alternatives by forcing a Muslim woman to choose between her hijab or prison guard training, say Muslim groups.
http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/192319

===

Was I a good American in the time of George Bush?

Was I a good American? How good an American was I? Did I do what I could to resist the takeover of my country and the brutalisation of my fellow human beings? How much further could I have gone? Were the crimes of the Bush administration those that demand you give up your life and everyday commitments to throw yourself into maximum resistance? If not, then what were we waiting for? The questions have troubled me regularly these last five years, because I was one of the millions of American citizens who did not shut down Guantánamo Bay and stop the other atrocities of the administration.

And there were others who were in resistance all along. I remember with admiration the Japanese-Americans who came out in the months after 9/11 to testify that they had been incarcerated en masse during the second world war, not for what they did but for who they were, and they were not going to remain silent as the same treatment was meted out to Arabs and Muslims. I remember the way that 20,000 of us in San Francisco came out to shut down the business district the day the war broke out, and the huge marches before and after. I remember the few congresspeople - mostly African-American - who dared to stand in opposition early on. I went to Camp Casey outside Bush's vacation home in Texas and spent a day with Cindy Sheehan, who gave her life over to stopping the war after it took her soldier son. Others did as she did. Some of them are my friends.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2033238,00.html

===

Iraqi resistance "winning"

"What happened is that the Americans trained death squads (of Iraqis) in Hungary before the invasion to take on members of one another community. My own cousin, a Shia, was trained in Turkey. But when he was asked to kill Sunnis, he just ran away.

"It was the Americans who spoke about Shia majority areas and Sunni triangles. Iraqis never used such expressions earlier. Despite American propaganda (that only Sunnis are against them), three Shia groups are fighting the Americans."

I knew that there were militias being used by the Americans very soon, but I have not before heard that there were squads of Iraqis being trained in Hungary prior to the invasion. Of course it wouldn't be surprising: the CIA used Iraqi exile groups to launch a series of terror campaigns in Iraq during the 1990s, including the blowing up of a schoolbus. They would presumably have reckoned that they might need to wage a terror war, even if they totally underestimated the scale of resistance.
http://leninology.blogspot.com/2007/03/iraqi-resistance-winning.html

===

Iraqi resistance formed one resistance organization

March 15, 2007 :

- Five major Iraqi resistance factions met for three days to establish a unified organization. Among these organizations: Islamic Army, Al-Rashdeen Army, 1920 Revolution Brigades, Islamic Resistance Front. The name of the new organization is not set yet.

- The judge of Anfal court ordered today to remove one of the defense team from the court threating him with imprisonment because lawyer badee Arif Ezzat said that he can prove with documents that Iran bombed the Kurds with chemical weapons.
http://www.roadstoiraq.com/category/middle-east/

===

Attacks in Iraq hit all-time high

THE number of attacks in Iraq during the last three months of 2006 was the highest for any such period since 2003, a Pentagon progress report to Congress said today.

"Although most attacks continue to be directed against coalition forces, Iraqi civilians suffer the vast majority of the casualties,'' the report said.

The quarterly report - Stability and Security in Iraq - did not reflect security conditions since the start of the year when the United States increased the number of troops in Baghdad to try break a spiral of sectarian violence.

Echoing a recent US intelligence estimate, it said the term "civil war'' did not capture the complexity of the conflict, which included "extensive'' sectarian violence but also attacks on coalition forces and criminality.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21385686-5005961,00.html

===

U.S. tolerates Shiite militias

The Times reports point blank today what ought to have been obvious since the start of the so-called "surge," namely, that the United States has decided to concentrate its fire on the Sunnis and give the Shiite death squads and paramilitary forces -- read: SCIRI -- a free pass. Notes the Times:

In Baghdad, American officials seem increasingly willing to tolerate some of those Shiite militias as long as they patrol their own neighborhoods. Administration officials said they had eased up on parts of the timetable for re-integrating former Baathists, for fear of a Shiite backlash.
http://robertdreyfuss.com/blog/2007/03/us_tolerates_shiite_militias.html

===

Hillary Clinton: Iraqi Occuption Will Continue If I'm President

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton foresees a "remaining military as well as political mission" in Iraq, and says that if elected president, she would keep a reduced military force there to fight Al Qaeda, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and possibly support the Iraqi military.

In a half-hour interview on Tuesday in her Senate office, Mrs. Clinton said the scaled-down American military force that she would maintain would stay off the streets in Baghdad and would no longer try to protect Iraqis from sectarian violence -- even if it descended into ethnic cleansing.

In outlining how she would handle Iraq as commander-in-chief, Mrs. Clinton articulated a more nuanced position than the one she has provided at her campaign events, where she has backed the goal of "bringing the troops home."

She said in the interview that there were "remaining vital national security interests in Iraq" that would require a continuing deployment of American troops.

This stance deserves deep consideration by Democratic primary voters. It's a genuinely and deeply conservative foreign policy strategy, involving indefinitely keeping US troops in Iraq for unspecified national security interests while calling the war over.

Hillary Clinton's promise to continue the Iraqi occupation will become the Democratic Party platform if she is the nominee. This is a very dangerous roadmap for the Democrats.

<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/smug_hill.jpg>Click for full size image of Hillary Clinton posed before the White Hoe Christmas tree with Clinton donor & cocaine smuggler Jorge Cabreras

http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/3/14/223929/022

===

Iraqi Resistance Report for events of Wednesday, 14 March 2007

* US blasts residential area south of al-Fallujah with heavy artillery Wednesday morning.
   * Resistance bomb destroys US Humvee near al-Fallujah Wednesday morning.
* Resistance assaults US checkpoint in northern al-Fallujah Tuesday evening. * Resistance sharpshooter kills Iraqi puppet “National Guard” Tuesday evening. * US soldier reported killed in Resistance attack in al-Hadithah late Tuesday afternoon. * Head of puppet town council of al-A‘zamiyah district assassinated Wednesday.
   * Mysterious car bomb explodes in western Baghdad Wednesday morning.
* Mysterious bomb kills two civilians in market in Tuz Khurmatu Wednesday morning. * US, puppet troops rampage through houses in Samarra’ as part of “Security” strategy.
   * Resistance sharpshooter reportedly kills US soldier in Samarra’ Tuesday.
   * US troops battle Iraqi Resistance men near Buhriz.
* Shi‘i sectarian Jaysh al-Mahdi gunmen blow up Sunni mosque near puppet army checkpoint in al-Iskandariyah.
   * Resistance fighters ambush puppet police patrol near Kirkuk.
   * Resistance attacks US camp near al-Miqdadiyah Wednesday night.
* Four US troops reported killed in Resistance bomb attack in Ba‘qubah Wednesday morning.
http://www.albasrah.net/pages/mod.php?mod=art&lapage=../en_articles_2007/0307/iraqiresistancereport_140307.htm

===

Israel's right to be racist

Israel's struggle for peace is a sincere one. In fact, Israel desires to live at peace not only with its neighbours, but also and especially with its own Palestinian population, and with Palestinians whose lands its military occupies by force. Israel's desire for peace is not only rhetorical but also substantive and deeply psychological. With few exceptions, prominent Zionist leaders since the inception of colonial Zionism have desired to establish peace with the Palestinians and other Arabs whose lands they slated for colonisation and settlement. The only thing Israel has asked for, and continues to ask for in order to end the state of war with the Palestinians and its Arab neighbours, is that all recognise its right to be a racist state that discriminates by law against Palestinians and other Arabs and grants differential legal rights and privileges to its own Jewish citizens and to all other Jews anywhere. The resistance that the Palestinian people and other Arabs have launched against Israel's right to be a racist state is what continues to stand between Israel and the peace for which it has struggled and to which it has been committed for decades. Indeed, this resistance is nothing less than the "New anti- Semitism".
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/836/op1.htm

===

Humiliation and Child Abuse at Israeli Checkpoints, Strip-Searching Children

Israeli officials have been regularly strip-searching children for decades, some of them American citizens.

While organizations that focus on Israel-Palestine have long been aware that Israeli border officials regularly strip search men and women, If Americans Knew appears to be the first organization that has specifically investigated the policy of strip searching women. In the course of its investigation, If Americans Knew was astonished to learn that Israeli officials have also been strip searching young girls as young as seven and below.
http://www.counterpunch.org/weir03152007.html

===


-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW  
_______________________________________________
is-lam mailing list
[email protected]
http://milis.isnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/is-lam

Kirim email ke