That /is/ the proper way to test it.
On my machine, HOL-Library takes 6 minutes of CPU time. If it takes
significantly more than that on yours, there's something wrong. If it
takes hours and still isn't done, there's something very wrong.
Are you sure the files are processed fully and without non-terminating
steps in Isabelle/jEdit?
If you share your version of HOL-Library with me, I'll happily take a
look at it.
On 09/03/18 23:54, viorel.preote...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am trying to test HOL-Library by using:
> ./bin/isabelle build -v HOL-Library
> But it takes very long. It has now been working for few hours, and it is
> still running.
> I also tried to open all files from HOL/Library in Isabelle/jedit and they
> were processed
> quite fast, without any errors.
> What is the appropriate way to test HOL-Library?
> Viorel Preoteasa
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Paulson <l...@cam.ac.uk>
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 12:49 PM
> To: viorel.preote...@gmail.com
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [isabelle-dev] Complete Distributive Lattice
> I don’t think it’s a problem that your more general theorems require the
> Axiom of Choice, and Hilbert_Choice.thy is not too large already (far from
> Larry Paulson
>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 21:35, <viorel.preote...@gmail.com>
>> <viorel.preote...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a question about how to organize these changes. The problem is
>> that most of the results for the more general lattice (instantiations
>> to set, fun) require Hilbert_Choice which is not available in
>> Complete_Lattice. Now I have added all results about complete distributive
>> lattices that need Hilbert Choice in Hilbert_Choice.thy. Is this acceptable?
> isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-dev mailing list