On 24/09/2018 18:41, Florian Haftmann wrote: > First-letter abbreviations are not very self-explanatory though. So I'd > go with something more explicit like »finite_support_fun« – note that > this type constructor does not show up in concrete type syntax, only in > type class instantiations, so its length should be fine.
It does show up in the name of the operations you define on it and the theorems you prove about it though. Manuel
_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev