hi! week was way to long. I'll do my review tomorrow morning, ok? LieGrue, strub
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis release 0.1.2-incubating (RC5) > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 6:47 PM > Hi Dan, > > > Please verify the release and cast your vote. > The vote will be open > > for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ X ] +1 > > > Things were a little confusing - the > ~/.m2/archetype-catalog.xml > definitely contained a definition for 0.1.2-incubating, > which was what > royally confused me that the archetype:generate command > kept failing > with a reference to 0.1.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT. > > What I did do, though, was at some point (after editting > the > src/site/resources/archetype-catalog.xml) to manually enter > the RC5 > quickstart-archetype directory and install it (mvn -o clean > install). > > Thereafter I could generate the archetype, which worked. > > If I assume that I temporarily had a contaminated > ~/.m2/archetype- > catalog.xml, then I am happy to accept RC5. Especially > seeing that the > quickstart-archetype module is included by default. > > So, from me, +1 > > Regards, > Kevin > > On 8 Jul 2011 at 17:56, Dan Haywood wrote: > > > > If I manually edit and change the version (and > follow up with an "mvn > > > archetype:crawl"), then I can create from > archetype and run them all > > > successfully - dnd, json, xhtml and html via the > quickrun module, > > > wicket and scimpi via importing the project into > Eclpse (Helios) with no > > > problems. > > > > The version of the archetype is found from the > > ~/.m2/archetype-catalog.xml. So when you say you > obliterate earlier > > versions of Isis, do you also remove/edit this > file? As you probably > > know, mvn archetype:crawl updates this local copy of > > archetype-catalog.xml, so that may be things work once > you've run that > > command? > > > > > > > If the above version issue is considered > non-blocking, let me know, so > > > I can reveal my vote. > > I'd consider it non-blocking. > > > > > > Cheers > > Dan > > > > > Regards, > > > Kevin > >
