I went looking for your code this evening to take a closer look, but couldn't find it in the tripp. Was I just being daft?
Sorry to be brief, sent from my phone On Dec 2, 2011 5:11 PM, "Kevin Meyer - KMZ" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I've (mostly) implemented an equivalent hidden() on object, and I > discovered that I was missing adding my HiddenMethodFact from the > metamodel. > > Now I got the hidden() method working in the htmlviewer, but it could > be a bit of a kludge, as this approach would need each viewer to be > handled specifically. > > Anyway - using this knowledge, I went back to the disabled() method, > and realised that I am probably looking at hooking into the isVetoed > and equivalent methods in the metamodel, but I can't find where the > Context is setup and appropriate Facets interrogated. > > Where else do I need to add my DisabledObjectFacet so that the > metamodel picks it up? > > Regards, > Kevin > > > On 30 Nov 2011 at 17:53, Kevin Meyer - KMZ wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > I remember discussing something like this with you at the Knockree > > retreat - I've implemented the various classes to support a > > String disabled(){..}; > > method on an object, to runtime prevent a user from editting any of the > > properties. > > > > The problem is, it doesn't work! :) > > > > Following the examples of the Immutable facet and the "validate" > > method facet, I have: > > > > public class DisabledObjectFacetViaDisabledMethod extends > DisabledObjectFacetAbstract implements ImperativeFacet > > > > where > > > > public abstract class DisabledObjectFacetAbstract extends FacetAbstract > implements DisabledObjectFacet > > > > and > > > > public interface DisabledObjectFacet extends Facet, > DisablingInteractionAdvisor > > > > The factory is registered in ProgrammingModelFacetsJava5: > > addFactory(DisabledObjectViaDisabledMethodFacetFactory.class); > > > > But when I load an object with the "disabled()" method, I can still edit > it. > > The "disabled" method is not visible, so it's being picked up... > > > > This tells me that the "DisablingInteractionAdvisor " is not doing what I > > expect.. > > > > What am I missing? > > > > > > Since the unit test passes, I'll check in the code, associated with > > ISIS-142 > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > > -- > Kevin Meyer, PhD, Pr.Sci.Nat > KMZ P.O. Box 9822, Sharon Park, South Africa. > Tel: +27 11 363 2001 Cell: +27 83 346 3045 > > >
