Hi Kevin, Had a look at this this morning... and have a fix. At client site at the mo so can't commit, will do this eve with more detail. Dan
On 5 December 2011 18:23, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for the update. But I still can't get it to work: > If you load DisabledObjectViaDisabledMethodFacetFactory, you'll see > various attempts in "process" and "addFacetToFacetHolder" (likewise > for HiddenObjectViaHiddenMethodFacetFactory). > > With > ObjectSpecification spec = > getSpecificationLookup().loadSpecification(cls); > List<ObjectAssociation> members = spec.getAssociations(); > > members turns out to be empty every time! > > With > Method methods[] = cls.getMethods(); > for (Method method : methods) > FacetUtil.addFacet(new > DisabledObjectFacetViaDisabledMethod(method, member)); > > it doesn't matter which facet I install, its never called. > > So I have gone back to hacking the HTML viewer to manually looking > for DisabledObjectFacet in ObjectView. Naturally, it means the other > viewers are oblivious. > > Regards, > Kevin > > > On 5 Dec 2011 at 11:06, Dan Haywood wrote: > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > bit rushed to reply in more detail, but the method you need is > > getAssociations() (which is inherited by ObjectSpecification from the > > superinterface, ObjectAssociationContainer). > > > > HTH > > Dan > > > > > > > > Sorry to give you the wrong steer there. > > > > On 5 December 2011 10:06, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > I'm trying to implement your alternate suggestion, but I'm having > > > issues. > > > > > > On 3 Dec 2011 at 7:03, Dan Haywood wrote: > > > > > > > final Method method = > > > > MethodFinderUtils.findMethod(cls, MethodScope.OBJECT, > > > DISABLED_PREFIX, > > > > String.class, NO_PARAMETERS_TYPES); > > > > > > > > for(ObjectMember member: objectSpec.getMembers()) { > > > > > > No such method as getMembers() on ObjectSpecification. > > > > > > > FacetUtil.addFacet(new DisabledObjectFacetViaDisabledMethod(method, > > > > member); > > > > } > > > > > > In fact, there is no such method anywhere except in the json applib. > > > > > > I'm trying to fetch ObjectMember based on Method... but that's not > > > looking good either! :) > > > > > > I understand what you're suggesting, I'm just having difficulties > making > > > it so! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Kevin > >
