Hi, Sorry - I missed this message.. phone screen too small :)
Just to add: Nope, *I* think your suggestions are fine. Regards, Kevin On 3 Sep 2012 at 23:13, Dan Haywood wrote: > Thanks for that. > > In the new support I've been adding for @Hidden(where=) [1], I distinguish > between parented collections and standalone collections. > > It occurred to me that we might want to specify different pagination sizes > for these two scenarios. > > So, something like: > > @Pagination(parented=10, standalone=25) > or > @Paged(parented=10, standalone=25) > > Any further opinions from anyone? > > Thx > Dan > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-258 > > > > On 2 September 2012 20:34, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > To avoid any possible ambiguity with physical page size, I would go for > > your last suggestion: > > @Pagination(size=25) [or @Pagination(25)] > > > > If that is too cumbersome (or you prefer a shorter annotation), then I'd > > also accept: > > @Paged(size=25) (or PageWith, if you twist my arm!) > > > > Offhand I can't think of anything else that might be better! > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > On 2 Sep 2012 at 19:53, Dan Haywood wrote: > > > > > The Wicket viewer has built-in support for paging of large parented > > > (Order#items) or standalone collections (CustomerRepo#listCustomers()). > > I > > > intend to add an annotation to allow the number of rows per page to be > > > configured. > > > > > > Any votes on what we call this annotation? > > > > > > @Page(size=25) > > > @Paged(size=25) > > > @PageWith(size=25) > > > @PageSize(25) > > > @Pagination(size=25) > > > > > > ... something else? > > > > > > For what it's worth, Naked Objects MVC uses @PageSize(25). > > > > > > Opinions please! > > > > > > Thx > > > Dan
