Hi, I support publication of the subject document. I do have comments.
1. Why do you call the reverse-metricn field, “Metric Offset”? This sounds like a remnant of some bad 20th century CLI…. 2. Please split the single sentence description immediately following figure 1 into multiple sentences. Maybe just refer to “Elements of Procedure” sections rather than one incomprehensible sentence. 3. Pervasive editorial comment, the plural of acronyms is does NOT have an apostrophe. For example, it is TLVs, not TLV’s. Thanks, Acee On 11/15/17, 5:43 PM, "Isis-wg on behalf of Christian Hopps" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/ > >which will last an extended 3 weeks to allow for IETF100. > >Thanks, >Chris. > >_______________________________________________ >Isis-wg mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg _______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
