I support publication of this document. For those of you who have followed this draft over the years, you will know that I have expressed concerns as to whether this is needed and/or is an appropriate way of achieving the desired behaviors. However, it is clear that this is seen as useful by operators, and I think with the addition of other use cases (mobility, spine-leaf, LDP-IGP sync), handling of TE, security discussion, and more complete deployment discussion this draft does provide a significant and useful mechanism and I am happy to support it.
Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Isis-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian > Hopps > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 2:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07 > > > The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/ > > which will last an extended 3 weeks to allow for IETF100. > > Thanks, > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg _______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
