Folks –
The conflict for SRMS Preference sub-TLV in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13#section-3.4 has already been noted and has been eliminated in the new version of the IS-IS SR draft which I expect to publish tomorrow. Note that although the IS-IS SR draft was given early allocation of some code points, a couple more sub-TLVs have been defined since then and these values have not yet been assigned by IANA. SRMS preference was one of them – though at the time of the writing of the version which added this the early allocation for MSD had not yet happened. Alia - I believe the MSD draft already is using the code points which have been assigned by early allocation – so I do not know what further update you believe is required in that document. ??? Les From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alia Atlas Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:01 AM To: Harish R Prabhu <harish.r.pra...@gmail.com> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org; isis-wg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] TLV conflict Hi Harish, Please take a look at https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-242 where it is clear that draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd has an early temporary registration for type 23. draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-02 should be updated to clearly state the IANA allocations that have already happened. draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13 MUST be updated to clearly state the IANA allocations that have already happened for it (e.g. values 2 & 19) and to STOP SQUATTING on already allocated code-points. Thank you for bringing this to our attention! Regards, Alia On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Harish R Prabhu <harish.r.pra...@gmail.com<mailto:harish.r.pra...@gmail.com>> wrote: While going through the I-Ds pertaining to SR attributes, it was found that the following 2 TLVs have been assigned the same Type number SRMS Preference Sub-TLV : https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13#section-3.4 Node MSD Advertisement : https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-02#page-4 Both these sections talk about different sub tlvs under router_capabilities TLV, but type value assigned is 23 for both. Request to address this. Thanks, -- Harish R Prabhu Bangalore, India. mailtp:harish.r.pra...@gmail.com<mailto:mailtp%3aharish.r.pra...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list Isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:Isis-wg@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
_______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list Isis-wg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
