TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Another suggestion is create a Custom Policy and disable RPC scanning which
> will provide a workaround for this finicky AIX and SGI boxes that is
> running portmapper due to a default installation of the operating system
> (i.e. portmapper 111)

It was not difficult to isolate the checks that were flipping out
specific boxes every time.  Designing a "lesser" policy that ran fine on
them was relatively simple, in fact.  I was speaking to the user that
had asked if we'd seen similar things - I suppose a "yes" would have
been sufficient, eh?  :)

My further point was more addressed to the random hangs - not the
consistent ones.  Anything that gives persistent results I can almost
certainly deal with, it's just the Eeny Meeny Miney Moe of hanging
that's going on currently that frustrates me.  Sure, I can go digging
into logs to try and find out what happened each run - but that's a
time-consuming process and I have other things to do.  I'm sure we ALL
do.

I have faith in ISS that their scans will stabilize - they seem to have
a good product, and it's served us well.  But until they whack the
gremlins that are popping up, a short-term solution would be very much
appreciated.  The simplest one that springs to mind is the ability to
stop the "Gremlin" scan without losing your bulk results.  It's also a
request I've heard before, so I decided to echo/parrot/<aol>Metoo!</aol>
the sentiment.

> If you conducting a scan on a large network (i.e. not a Class 'C') break up
> the scan into multiple parts, therefore eliminating the amount of time a
> scan may take for those troublesome hosts on particular networks.

As a rule, I have broken our scans down into chunks of about 150 hosts
per run.  This is a scan-time of (for us) between one and two hours.  I
don't think this is unreasonable at all - but it's still a frustrating
block of time to lose.  What approximate scan-time are you using, if I
may ask?

Thanks for your time and insight!

Dan Ozdowski

UVA Network Systems


Reply via email to