TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Haradon, Dorita (ISSAtlanta) 
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ISS XForce
Subject: RE: comparison Dragon - Real Secure


Hi Manuel,

Here's the competitive information you requested:

DRAGON SENSOR WEAKNESSES

1.      Extensive Unix experience required - this product is NOT for the
mainstream user.
2.      Difficult to install, configure, and manage.
3.      No Windows sensor or management solution - this is a huge
disadvantage for them.
4.      Pattern matching and stateful inspection signatures mostly - very
few protocol analysis signatures.  This means that a new signature must be
written for every attack, unlike RealSecure's protococol analysis which can
detect most attacks without requiring an update.   This is a major advantage
of doing protocol analysis vs. pure pattern-matching.  Dragon requires that
a huge store of signatures be used because each signature is specific to
only one method of attack, not variants of the same attack like RealSecure.
This is why they need so many signatures and require such frequent updates. 
5.      No high level logic on ANY signatures.  There is a single ASCII
signature file that users can edit to create their own signatures.  All sigs
we've seen seem to be simple pattern or string-based matching - no
complicated algorithms or decryption like many of the RealSecure sigs.
6.      Very easy to "break" a signature while trying to fine-tune it.
7.      Limited response options compared to RealSecure - Dragon only
supports Email/Paging, SNMP traps, Syslog, and User-defined scripts.
8.      No third party integration like we have with Check Point where a
triggered event can invoke rule creation on the firewall. 
9.      Based on TCPDump-like model - they capture data then parse it to
trigger events; not quite real-time.
10.     Weak integrated host- and network-based IDS solution.

WHY REALSECURE 7.0 SLAYS DRAGON SENSOR 6.0:

Accuracy 
Performance
Integration
Security Content
Service and Support

RealSecure employs a combination of state-of-the-art IDS techniques,
resulting in the most accurate and best performing IDS on the market today.


�       7-layer protocol analysis and anomaly detection
�       attack pattern matching
�       stateful packet inspection
�       real-time attack verification (server responses)
�       vulnerability correlation via the Security Fusion module
�       standard user-defined signatures and Snort imports with a validation
tool to ensure the signature is constructed properly
�       statistical anomaly detection via SiteProtector and FastAnalysis
�       behavior-based/application-based detection via RealSecure Desktop
Protector

Our protocol analysis detects actual attacks, thus virtually eliminating
false positives, false negatives, and mis-identified attacks.  RealSecure
analyzes nearly 100 protocols,  detecting over 1500 known attacks and
countless unknown attacks - REAL attacks, not just non-standard packets like
most other IDSs that employ an elementary form of protocol analysis.
RealSecure is irrefutably the most accurate IDS on the market.  Dragon just
can't compete with ISS' accuracy.  

RealSecure recently won the "NSS Approved" award from the prestigious,
independent testing firm, The NSS Group, based in the UK.  Check out
www.nss.co.uk to download a copy of the complete evaluation of the
RealSecure 7.0 Protection System.

Let me know if you need anything else.
-Dorita

*******************************************
Dorita Haradon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
Technical Marketing Manager
Internet Security Systems (NASDAQ: ISSX) 
6303 Barfield Road, Building B, 4th Floor 
Atlanta, Georgia  30328 
Office:  404-236-2856  Mobile:  770-598-2502 
http://www.iss.net      -      The Power to Protect 
ISS Press Releases:
http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/prlist.jsp
******************************************** 




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ISS XForce
Subject: comparison Dragon - Real Secure
Importance: High



TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, does any body know some free research information on the web
about a comparison between(among) the IDS Dragon and real secure network
I need this urgent information. 

Best Regards
_________________________________
V�ctor Manuel Gaete
Gerente de Negocios
ORION -Servicios Profesionales en Seguridad de la Informaci�n
www.orion.cl
Fono:56-2- 640.39.00
Santiago-Chile




Reply via email to