[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14877320#comment-14877320
]
clebert suconic commented on ARTEMIS-225:
-----------------------------------------
[~jmesnil] with JMS2, wouldn't be possible to open subscription without
specifying the clientID? I'm writing this on a Saturday.. maybe I'm crazy or
something... but couldn't be the case that we should just allow not specifying
clientID?
> Incomplete Activation Validation
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-225
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-225
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.1.0
> Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
> Assignee: Justin Bertram
> Fix For: 1.2.0, 1.1.1
>
>
> When a MDB is deployed with the activation config property
> subscriptionDurability set to Durable but without a required clientId
> property, it generates NPE in our app server since the RA tries to create a
> queue which name is an non-null empty string.
> When the Activation validate its spec, it should verify the presence of the
> clientId property if the subscriptionDurability is Durable
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
