[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14903230#comment-14903230
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-225:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/173

    Revert "ARTEMIS-225 validate clientID is set for durable sub"

    This reverts commit 1c933cfbaeae6518e2fcf55bcb58f3b714f04370.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-artemis master-revert

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/173.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #173
    
----
commit 7a337a7e552c0679d80ef2600c2ef6f7daf954ba
Author: Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-09-22T00:39:07Z

    Revert "ARTEMIS-225 validate clientID is set for durable sub"
    
    This reverts commit 1c933cfbaeae6518e2fcf55bcb58f3b714f04370.

----


> Incomplete Activation Validation
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-225
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>             Fix For: 1.2.0, 1.1.1
>
>
> When a MDB is deployed with the activation config property 
> subscriptionDurability set to Durable but without a required clientId 
> property, it generates NPE in our app server since the RA tries to create a 
> queue which name is an non-null empty string.
> When the Activation validate its spec, it should verify the presence of the 
> clientId property if the subscriptionDurability is Durable



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to